Quantitative Productivity Analysis Of Broiler Farming Business With System Closed House And System Open House
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v16i2.286Keywords:
Broiler, Deplesi, Feed Conversation Ratio, Index PerformanceAbstract
This research was conducted in Banjarmasin City, South Kalimantan Province. The study was conducted in October 2023. The objective was to analyze the differences in quantitative productivity between broiler farms maintained under closed and open house systems. The subjects used in the study were 180,000 broilers raised in 15 cages each, each with a population of 6,000 birds per cage. This research was conducted at the broiler partnership farm of PT Mitra Sinar Jaya. The research method used a quantitative descriptive approach, with data obtained from the maintenance records of partner farmers. The number of recordings came from 6,000 broilers per cage, with 15 replications for each type of closed house and open house. The quantitative productivity observed in this study were depletion (mortality + culling), number of birds harvested, Feed Intake (FI), average harvest body weight (ABW), Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), harvest age, cage density, and Performance Index (IP). Data were analyzed using an Independent t-test. Based on the results of the study, it shows that depletion, the number of harvested chickens, ABW, FCR, FI, broiler harvest age have no significant differences (P>0.05) between closed house and open house cages. While in quantitative productivity, cage density and IP there are differences between broilers raised with closed house and open house cage systems. From the average value there is a tendency for closed houses to be better than open houses seen from the depletion value which is better by 63 heads (174 heads vs. 237 heads); the number of harvested chickens is better by 63 heads (5826 heads vs. 5763 heads); FI is better by 0.034 (2.798 kg/head vs. 2.832 kg/head); ABW is better by 0.05 kg (1.79 kg and 1.74 kg); FCR is better by 0.068 (1.555 kg feed/kg bw vs. 1.623 kg feed/kg bw); A better cage density of 4 birds/m² (13 birds/m² vs. 9 birds/m²) and a 27-point higher Performance Index (PI) (350 vs. 323), except for the same harvest age (32 days vs. 32 days).The conclusion of this study is that the depletion value, number of birds harvested, Feed Intake (FI), ABW, FCR, and cage density of broilers using a closed house system tend to be better than those using an open house system. The success rate of broiler farming is achieved by farmers using a closed house system because the Performance Index (PI) value is higher than that of farmers using an open house system. Based on the research results, which show that closed houses tend to be 8.35% better than open houses, it is recommended that farmers using closed and open house systems improve the quality of human resources and record keeping as a basis for continuous management evaluation to achieve optimal productivity.
Downloads
References
Anonimus. 2012. Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Jakarta:Kementerian Pertanian. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan.
Ahmadi. 2008. Sistem Perkandangan Unggas. http://kandangclosed house. wordpress.com.
Alam S. 2018. Terampil Mengoperasikan Broiler Closed house. Infovet Majalah Peternakan dan Kesehatan. www.majalahinfovet.com.
Andreas. 2016. Evaluasi Performan Ayam Broiler Strain Cobb dan Ross Pada Tipe Kandang Close dan Open. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Islam Malang. Malang.
Anggitasari, S., O. Sjofyan, dan I. H. Djunaidi. 2016. Pengaruh Beberapa Jenis Pakan Komersial Terhadap Kinerja Produksi Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Ayam Pedaging. Buletin Peternakan 40 (3): 187-196.
Araujo. F. E, Garcia R. G, Silva. R, Caldara. F. R. 2015. Broiler Surface Temperature and Behavioral Response Under Two Different Light Sources. Journal Of Poultry Science. 17(2):219-226.
Armelia, V., Ismoyowati, I., dan Setianto, N. A. 2022. Produktivitas Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler Menggunakan Tipe Kandang Open house, Semi Closed house Dan Closed house. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan, 10(1), 26-32.
Aryadi, F., Murni, R., & Manin, F. 2022. Komposisi Kimia Daging Ayam Broiler yang diberi Tepung Ikan Rucah Berprobiotik. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 25(2), 134-147.
Aryanti, F. 2010. Kompetensi kinerja karyawan kandang ayam broiler milik peternak di wilayah desa Cisalopa, Cinagara, Bogor.
Azis, A., H. Abbas, Y. Heryandu, dan E. Kusnadi. 2011. Pertumbuhan Kompensasi dan Efisiensi Produksi Ayam Broiler Yang Mendapat Pembatasan Waktu Makan. Media peternakan. 34 (1):50-57.
Budiarta, D. H., Sudjarwo, E., and Cholis, N. 2014. Effect Of Cage Density On Feed Intake, Body Weight Gain, And Feed Conversion In Broiler. Ternak Tropika Journal of Tropical Animal Production, 15(2), 31-35.
Dahlan, M., dan N. Hudi. 2011. Studi Manajemen Perkandangan Ayam Broiler Di Dusun Wangket Desa Kaliwates Kecamatan Kembangbahu Kabupaten Lamongan. Jurnal Ternak 02 (1): 24-29.
Fadillah. R, 2007. Sukses Berternak Ayam Broiler. PT.Agromedia Pustaka: Ciganjur.
Gustira, E, Dwi, Riyanti dan T. Kurtini. 2015. Pengaruh Kepadatan Kandang Terhadap Performa Produksi Ayam Petelur Fase Awal Grower. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu Vol. 3(1): 87 – 92
Hue, O., Le Bouquin, S., Lalande, F., Allain, V., Rouxel, S., Petetin, I., and Chemaly, M. 2011. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. on broiler chicken carcasses and risk factors at the slaughterhouse in France in 2008. Food Control, 22(8), 1158-1164.
Hulzebosch J. 2004. Housing Poultry.International Course on Poultry Husbandry. PTC+ Barneveld, the Netherlands.
Ibrahim. 1998. Studi Kelayakan Bisnis. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Iskandar, S., Setyaningrum, Y. Amanda, dan I. Rahayu. 2009. Pengaruh Kepadatan Kandang Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Perilaku Ayam Wareng Tangerang. Balai Penelitian Ternak Ciawi. 14(1):19-24.
Kartasudjana, R. dan E. Suprijatna. 2006. Manajemen Ternak Unggas. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Kementerian Pertanian. 2019. Buletin Konsumsi Pangan. Vol. 10 (1), 2019.
Kusnadi, E. 2006. Suplementasi vitamin C sebagai penangkal cekaman panas pada ayam broiler. Jitv, 11(4), 249-253.
Lacy, M., & Vest, L. R. 2000. Improving Feed in Broiler: A Guide for Growers.
Laili, A. R., Damayanti, R., Setiawan, B., and Hidanah, S. 2022. Comparison of broiler performance in closed house and open house systems in trenggalek. Journal of Applied Veterinary Science and Technology, 3(1), 6-11.
Mahardika,C. B. D. P., Pello, W. Y., dan Pallo, M. 2020. Performa usaha kemitraan ayam ras pedaging. Partner, 25(1), 1270-1281.
Marom, A. T., U. Kalsum, U. Ali. 2017. Evaluasi Performans Broiler Pada Sistem Kandang Closed house Dan Open house Dengan Altitude Berbeda. Dinamika Rekasatwa, 2 (2).
Marom, A. T., Kalsum, U., dan Ali, U. 2018. Evaluasi performans broiler pada sistem kandang closed house dan open house dengan altitude berbeda. Dinamika Rekasatwa: Jurnal Ilmiah (e-Journal), 2(2).
Medion info. 2010. Berhasil tidaknya pemeliharaan ayam broiler. http://info.medion.co.id/index.php/artikel broiler.
Mulyadi. 2001. Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Mulyantini, N. G. A., Ulrikus, R. L., Bryden, W. L., and Li, X. 2010. Different levels of digestible methionine on performance of broiler starter. Animal Production, 12(1).
Nazir, Moh. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.Nazmi. M. S, Serin T., Wannik W. M. K. 2015. Benchmarking Of Broiler Production Technology In Malaysia. J.Ekonomic and Tecnology Management Review.!0(2): 89-99.
North, M. O. and Bell, DD. 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4th Ed.the Avi Publishing Company Inc. Wesport, Connecticut.
Nugraha, Y. A., K. Nissa, N. Nurbaeti, F. M. Amrullah, dan D.W. Harjanti. 2017. Pertambahan Bobot Badan dan Feed Conversion Rate Ayam Broiler yang Dipelihara Menggunakan Desinfektan Herbal. J. Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 27 (2):19 – 24.
Nuryati, T. 2019. Analisis performans ayam broiler pada kandang tertutup dan kandang terbuka performance analysis of broiler in closed house and opened house. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara, 5(2), 77-86.
Osti R.,Bhattarai D., and Zhou D. 2017. Climatic Variation: Effects On Stress Levels, Feed Intake, And Bodyweight Of Broiler. Journal Of PoultryScience. 19(3):489-496.
Pakage, S., Hartono, B., Fanani, Z., Nugroho, B. A., Iyai, D. A., Palulungan, J. A., dan Nurhayati, D. 2020. Pengukuran Performa Produksi Ayam Pedaging pada Closed house Sistemdan Open house Sistemdi Kabupaten Malang Jawa Timur Indonesia. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 15(4), 383-389.
Permana, A. D., Yahya, I. F., Agustiningrum, S., Choiria, R. D., dan Nasrullah, A. J. 2020. Dampak kepadatan (density) kandang terhadap tingkat deplesi pada ayam broiler parent stock fase grower. Aras Journal, 2(2), 1-10.
Pratikno H. 2010. Pengaruh Ekstrak Kunyit (Curcuma Domestica Val) terhadap Bobot Badan Ayam Broiler (Gallus Sp). Buletin Anatomi dan Fisiologi Vol. XVIII, No. 2. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Purwantoro, D. 2015. Tingkatkan Produksi Broiler dengan Cara Modern (Closed house). Dhanangclosed house. com/tingkatkan-produksi-broiler-dengan-cara-moden.(19 Februari 2015).
Rasyaf, M. 1994. Beternak Ayam ras petelur. Penerbit PT. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Riswanti, N. A. 2014. Kelayakan Pembesaran Ayam Broiler Sistem Perkandangan Terbuka Dan Tertutup Pada Cv Perdana Putra Chicken Bogor. Skripsi. Departemen Agribisnis Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Sahara, E, E. Raudhaty, dan F. Maharany. 2012. Performa Ayam pedaging Dengan Penambahan Enzim Fitase Dalam Pakan. Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya. 1 (1):34-40.
Santoso, H. dan T. Sudaryani. 2009. Pembesaran Ayam Pedaging di Kandang Panggung Terbuka. Cetakan Pertama. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
Sjofjan, O., dan Djunaidi, I. H. 2016. Pengaruh beberapa jenis pakan komersial terhadap kinerja produksi kuantitatif dan kualitatif ayam pedaging. Buletin Peternakan, 40(3), 187.
Soekartawi. 1993. Prinsip Dasar Ekonomi Pertanian Teori dan Aplikasinya Rajawali Pers. Jakarta
Suasta, I., Mahardika, I.G., Sudiastra, I.W.. 2019. Evaluasi Produksi Ayam Broiler Yang Dipelihara Dengan Sistem Closed house. Maj. Ilm. Peternak. Vol 22 (1), Pp 21-24.
Sufiriyanto, Ning Iriyanti dan Emmy Susanti. 2018. Hematology Profiles and Performance of Broiler Chickens Feed on Commercial Feed. Annimal Production. Scientific Journal of Farm Animals and Feed Resources in the Tropic.Faculty of Animal Science Jenderal Soedirman University in collaboration with Indonesian Society of Animal Science. Volume 20. Number 3, 2018.
Suwarta, S., and Hanafie, R. 2018. The influence of business management on income and the risk of income in the broiler chicken farming.
Sujana, E. D., S. Darana dan I. Setiawan. 2011. Implementasi Teknologi Semi Closed-House SistemPada Performan Ayam Broiler Di Test Farm Sustainable Livestock Techno Park, KampusFakultas Peternakan Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner: 362-266.
Susanti, T., Purba, M., and Prasetyo, L. H. 2016. The potential of white Muscovy as parent stock for the production of broiler ducks. In International Seminar on Livestock Production and Veterinary Technology (pp. 359-364).
Talib, C.A. Bamualim, I. Inounu,2007. Restrukturisasi Peternakan di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, Penerbit : Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian Vol 5.
Uman,K.M., S.H.Prayogi, V. M. A. Nurgiartiningsih., 2014. The Performance of Broiler Rearing in SistemStage Floor and Double Floor. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan24 (3): 79 –87.
Wahju. 2004. Ilmu Nutrisi Unggas. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada Press. Hal: 44.
Winarno Surakhmad. 1985. Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah: Dasar, Metode, dan Teknik. Bandung, Tarsito.
Yulianti, F.. 2012. Kajian Analisis Pola Usaha Pengembangan Ayam Broiler Di Kota Banjarbaru. Kemendikbud Ilmu Sos. Vol 4 (1), Pp 65-72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 nizham pradiptha; Mudawamah, Umi Kulsum,
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
