The Use of Restaurant Organic Waste Flour as a Substitute for Concentrate in Joper's Chicken Feed

Dedi Suryanto; Usman Ali

doi:10.30736/jt.v13i2.183

Authors

Dedi Suryanto Faculty of Animal Husbandry, University of Islamic Malang, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Usman Ali Faculty of Animal Husbandry, University of Islamic Malang, Malang, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v13i2.183

Keywords:

Concentrate Feed, Complete Feed, Restaurant Organic Waste, Joper Chicken Perform

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to analyze body weight gain and the efficiency of feed use in the maintenance of Joper chicken using restaurant organic waste (ROW) as a substitute for concentrated feed. The research material was 75 male Joper free-range chickens aged 1.5 month with initial weight of 0.57 â€“ 0.80 g/head with a coefficient of diversity 9.25%. The feed ingredients were ground corn, rice bran, concentrate, commercial feed and dry milled ROW. The equipment for cages was for feeding, drinking, and weighing. The study was conducted for 30 days with experimental methods and a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatment feeds, repeated 3 times, and each experimental unit filled with 5 heads. Substitution with concentrate in feed can improve performance and feed efficiency in Joper chickens. The results showed that the use of 60% ROW (T4) as a substitute for concentrate feed had a significant effect (P<0.05) on increasing feed conversion ratio and efficiency in Joper native chickens. On the other result, significant increase on (P<0.05) body weight gained because of feed containing 40% concentrate (T1), rather than the feeds with containing ROW materials. This means that the use of organic waste from restaurant 60% or 24% in feed as concentrate substitute optimally increased feed efficiency and body weight gain of Joper native chicken.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Usman, A. 2016. Nutrition Science Practicum Guidelines. Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Islamic University of Malang

Ensminger, ME, JE Oldfield, and WW Heinemann. 1995. Feed and Nutrition The Ensminger Publishing Company, California

Marom, T. 2016. Nutritional and quantitative potential of organic restaurant waste in Batu Wisata Malang as feed for Alabio and Peking Crossed Ducks. Skripsi. Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Islamic University of Malang.

Anonimous. 2015. Laboratorium Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak, Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

Prakoso. 2019. The Effect of Feeding House Waste on Performance in Broiler Chicken. UNP Press. Kediri

Achadri, Y., Tyasari, F. G., Dughita, P. A. Utilization of Organic Waste from Restaurants as Alternative Feed for Fish Cultivation. Gronomika. 13(1).

Andriyanto, AS Satyaningtijas, R. Yufiadri, R. Wulandari, VM Darwin and SNA Siburian. 2015. Performance and digestibility of broiler chicken feed treated with testosterone with dosegraded. J. Acta Veterinaria Indonesiaa. 3(1): 29-37

Allama, H., Sofyan, O., Widodo, E., and Prayogi, HS 2012. Effect of using caterpillar meal (Alphitobius diaperinus) in feed on the performance of broiler production. Journal of Animal Sciences, 22(3), 1-8.

Astuti, N. 2012. Performance of Free-range Chicken with Broiler Concentrate-Based Ration. Journal of Agribusiness, 4(5): 51-58.

Usman, A. 2016. Nutrition Science Practicum Guidelines. Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Islamic University of Malang.

Martini. 2002 Utilization of Cocoa Peel as Alternative Feed in Broiler Ration. Thesis. Faculty of Animal Science, Andalas University, Padang

Tillman, AD, H. Hartadi, S. Reksohadi prodjo, S. Prawirokusumo and S. Lebdosoekojo. 1989. Basic Animal Feed Science. The fourth edition of the Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta

Ichwan, 2003. Making Broiler Chicken Feed. Agro Media Pustaka, Tangerang

Pakaya, SA 2019. Performance of Super Kampung Chicken Given the Addition Level of Fermented Cocoa skin Flour (Theobroma Cacao, L.) in the Ration. Jambura Journal of Animal Science 1.2: 40-45

Sinurat, AP 2020. The Addition of Enzymes in Feeds with Different Nutrient Densities on the Performance of KUB Chickens in the Starter Period. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Technology. Vol. 20. No. 20.

Herdiana, R. M., Y. M. R. Dewanti dan Sudiyono. 2014. Pengaruh Penggunaan Ampas Kecap dalam Pakan terhadap Pertambahan Bobot Badan Harian, Konversi Pakan, Rasio Efisiensi Protein, dan Produksi Karkas Itik Lokal Jantan Umur 8 Minggu. Bul. Peternakan

Edjeng S. and R. Kartasudjana. 2006. Poultry Livestock Management. Self-help spreader, Jakarta

Lacy, M dan Vest, LR 2000. Immoving Feed Conversion in Broiler: a guide for growershttp://www.ces.uga.edu/pubed//c:793-w.html

Pesti, G.M., Whiting, T.S., and Jensen, L.S. 2009. The effect of crumbling on the relationship between dietery density and chick growth, feed efficiency and abdominal fat pad weights. Poult.Sci., 62: 490-494.