Comparative Analysis of Probiotic Interventions for Improving Productivity Indicators in Broiler Chickens: A Global Systematic Review

Authors

  • Iman Aji Wijoyo Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang
  • Devinta Firanda
  • Sabila Mahesa Ayu Ramadan
  • Dini Sukma Ayu
  • Irsyadul Khabib
  • Ponchi Arnold Dopong Maring

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v16i2.276

Keywords:

broiler chicken, Probiotic, Performance, Feed Conversion Ratio, Productivity

Abstract

Industri unggas broiler terus mengalami pertumbuhan pesat, didorong oleh meningkatnya permintaan global akan protein hewani. Namun, tantangan terkait efisiensi pakan, kesehatan usus, dan keberlanjutan lingkungan tetap menjadi isu kritis dalam produksi broiler. Penggunaan probiotik dalam pakan broiler telah diadopsi sebagai alternatif antibiotik; meskipun demikian, efektivitasnya bervariasi tergantung pada jenis probiotik, dosis, dan kondisi lingkungan. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi probiotik terbaik untuk ayam broiler, mengevaluasi dan membandingkan efektivitas berbagai jenis probiotik dalam meningkatkan produktivitas broiler, dengan fokus pada peningkatan berat badan, efisiensi pakan, dan kesehatan usus. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis (SLR) sesuai dengan pedoman PRISMA 2020. Pencarian literatur dilakukan di lima basis data utama: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, dan Google Scholar. Kriteria inklusi mencakup studi empiris yang mengevaluasi efek probiotik pada ayam broiler yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2015 dan 2025. Data diekstrak dan dianalisis menggunakan NVivo 14 untuk sintesis tematik Kualitas artikel dinilai menggunakan Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Sebanyak 23 studi dimasukkan dalam analisis. Probiotik berbasis Bacillus dan multi-strain menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan dalam pertambahan berat badan, rasio konversi pakan (FCR), dan kesehatan usus pada ayam broiler. Probiotik multi-strain menunjukkan efek sinergis yang lebih unggul dalam meningkatkan performa ayam broiler dibandingkan dengan probiotik strain tunggal. Rekomendasi untuk penelitian selanjutnya meliputi uji perbandingan langsung antara berbagai jenis probiotik dalam kondisi yang lebih terstandarisasi dan eksplorasi lebih lanjut tentang sinbiotik sebagai alternatif yang lebih komprehensif.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biswas, A., et al. The effect of multi-strain probiotics as feed additives on performance, immune response, gut morphology and expression of nutrient transporter genes in broiler chickens. Animal Bioscience, 34(3), 419–429, 2021, doi: https://www.animbiosci.org/upload/pdf/ajas-20-0749.pdf.

Buahom, C., Chantarasiri, A., & Chantarasiri, P. Synergistic effects of synbiotic supplementation on growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 32(1), 118–127, 2023,doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2022.11.005

Compassion in Food Business.Broiler welfare and global production trends. Compassion in World Farming, 2023, doi: https://www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com

Ebeid, T. A., El-Hanoun, A. M., & Rayan, A. M. Influence of Bacillus-based probiotics on growth, carcass traits, and intestinal health of broilers. Poultry Science, 100(3), 100905, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.021

Elleithy, E. A., Abd El-Hack, M. E., & Noreldin, A. E. Effect of Bacillus coagulans and Bacillus licheniformis supplementation on broiler performance and intestinal morphology. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 299, 115522, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115522.

Gaggia, F., Mattarelli, P., & Biavati, B. Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 291, 10–18., 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.11.007.

Gao, X., Li, Y., & Wang, J. Synbiotic effects of Bacillus subtilis and inulin on growth performance and intestinal health of broiler chickens. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 902334, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.902334

Hernández-Coronado, C. G., et al. Effect of probiotic supplementation on productive performance and intestinal integrity of broiler chickens exposed to heat stress. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 57(2), 48–63, 2025, doi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11250-025-04488-3

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., & Vedel, I. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018: User guide. McGill University. 2018, doi: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com.

Hussien, M., et al. Probiotic Bacillus strains in poultry health: An overview and applications. Poultry Science, 102(4), 74–83, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2022.00844

Jha, R., Das, R., Oak, S., & Mishra, P. Probiotics (direct-fed microbials) in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, growth and laying performance: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 260, 114327, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114327

Khalil, M. M., El-Kassas, S., & Osman, A. Impact of Enterococcus faecium (Protexin) supplementation on growth and immune response of broiler chickens. Veterinary World, 14(10), 2723–2730, 2021, doi: .https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.2723-2730.

Mirza, A. A., Al-Baadani, H. H., & El-Saadony, M. T. Dietary Bacillus-based probiotics improve feed efficiency and intestinal integrity in broilers. Animals, 13(6), 987 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13060987.

Moawad, A. A., Zahran, S. M., & Abdel-Rahman, M. A. Performance and immune response of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with multi-strain probiotics. Poultry Science Journal, 11(2), 145–158, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22069/psj.2023.19631.1863.

Mountzouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. Evaluation of the efficacy of a multi-strain probiotic supplement in promoting broiler performance and modulating intestinal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poultry Science, 100(6), 101232, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101232

Our World in Data. (2024). Global poultry production statistics. https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Qiu, K., et al. Dietary supplementation of a new probiotic compound improves antioxidant status and immune function in broiler chickens. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 913830. 2022, doi: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9138300/

Rahman, M. M., et al. Combined effect of Bacillus subtilis and Saccharomyces boulardii on growth performance, feed conversion, and intestinal health in broilers. Poultry Science, 100(7), 1184–1192, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/peab089

Sugiharto, S. Role of nutraceuticals in gut health and growth performance of poultry. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 15(2), 99–111, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2014.06.001

Yu, X., et al. Effects of probiotics on the growth performance of broilers. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 846649, 2022, doi: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.846649/full

Zhang, Q., et al. Probiotics in poultry production: Mechanisms of action and benefits. Animal Nutrition, 7(1), 1–13, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.11.004

Zou, J., et al. Effects of multi-strain probiotics on intestinal health and performance in broiler chickens: A meta-analysis. Poultry Science, 101(2), 195–207, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pxab038

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Iman Aji Wijoyo, Devinta Firanda, Sabila Mahesa Ayu Ramadan, Dini Sukma Ayu, Irsyadul Khabib, & Ponchi Arnold Dopong Maring. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Probiotic Interventions for Improving Productivity Indicators in Broiler Chickens: A Global Systematic Review. Jurnal Ternak, 16(2), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v16i2.276

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.