Biomass Production and Nutrient Content Animal Feed in Kuantan Singingi District

Infitria Infitria; Pajri Anwar; Jiyanto Jiyanto

doi:10.30736/jt.v12i1.82

Biomass Production and Nutrient Content Animal Feed in Kuantan Singingi District

Infitria Infitria^(1*), Pajri Anwar⁽²⁾, Jiyanto Jiyanto⁽³⁾,

(1) Departement of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kuantan Singingi Islamic University - Riau
(2) Departement of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kuantan Singingi Islamic University - Riau
(3) Departement of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kuantan Singingi Islamic University - Riau
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Forage is a major requirement in increasing ruminant livestock production. Kuantan Singingi Regency is a district that has quite a lot of grasslands whose production and quality of forage are unknown, so this study aims to determine the production and nutritional content of forages in Kuantan Singingi Regency. This research consisted of three stages, survey (field observation and location determination), forage sampling, and nutrient quality analysis. Forage samples were taken in 4 sub-districts, namely the Districts of Central Kuantan, Sentajo Raya, Gunung Toar and Kuantan Mudik. 5 locations were taken for each sub-district, 4 points for each location were taken. The tools used for forage sampling consisted of a 0.5 x 0.5 m2 quadrant, grass shears, sickle, plastic bags of size 10 and size 2 kg, sacks, plastic ropes, and stationery. The analysis of nutrient quality using forage samples in 4 districts using proximate analysis. Forage production data and forage nutrient content were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results showed that there were differences in production and nutrient content in each sub-district P<0.05. Fresh biomass production showed a significant effect of P<0.05. Fresh forage production ranged from 111.67±16.45 Kg FW/ha/day, while dry forage production ranged from 23.80±5.29 Kg to 187.04±67.35 Kg. The conclusion of this study is that the production and nutritional content of forage in Kuantan Singingi Regency is relatively low, the production of DW/ha/day is 23.80-40.35 Kg, and the CP ranges from 7.85-10.55% DW.

Keywords

Forages, Nutrient, Cruide Protein, Cruide Fiber, Biomassa Production,

Full Text:

Article

References

BPS, Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi Dalam Angka. kuansing, 2018.

V.H. Hae, M.M Kleden, and S.T. Temu, “Produksi, Komposisi Botani dan Kapasitas Tampung Hijauan pada padang Penggembalaan Alam Awal Musim Kemarau,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2020.

N.M. Sengkey, A.H.S. Salendu, E. Wantesan, P.O.V. Walelelng, “Potensi Pengembangan Ternak Sapi Potong Di Kecamatan Tompaso Barat,” Zootec, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 350, 2017, doi: 10.35792/zot.37.2.2017.16155.

O. Yoku, A. Supriyantono, T. widayati, and I. Sumpe, “Produksi Padang Penggembalaan Alam Dan Potensi Pengembangan Sapi Bali Dalam Mendukung Program Kecukupan Daging Di Papua Barat,” Pastura, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 102–105, 2014, doi: 10.24843/Pastura.2014.v03.i02.p11.

R.K. Dewi, “Analisis Potensi Wilayah Pengembangan Ternak Ruminansia Di Kabupaten Lamongan,” J. ternak, vol. 09, no. 2, 2018.

H. Rusnan, C.H.L.Kaunang, and Y.l.R.Tulung, “Analisis Potensi Dan Strategi Pengembangan Sapi Potong Dengan Pola Integrasi Kelapa–Sapi Di Kabupaten Halmahera Selatan Provinsi Maluku Utara,” Zootec, vol. 35, no. 2, p. 187, 2015, doi: 10.35792/zot.35.2.2015.7433.

Muhajirin, Despal, and Khalil, “Pemenehuhan Kebutuhan Nutrient Sapi Potong Bibit Yang Digembalakan Di Padang Mengatas,” vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2017.

R.K. Putra, H.P. Nastiti, Y.H. Manggol, “Komposisi Botani Dan Produksi Hijauan Makanan Ternak Padang Penggembalaan Alam Di Desa Letneo Kecamatan Insana Kabupaten TTU,” Nukl. Peternak., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2018.

F.M. Ferianita, Metode Sampling Bioekologi. jakarta: bumiaksara, 2006.

M. Junaidi and D. Sawen, “Keragaman Botanis dan Kapasitas Tampung Padang Penggembalaan Alami Kabupaten Yapen,” J. Ilmu Peternak. dan Vet. …, vol. 5, no. 2, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://journal.fapetunipa.ac.id/index.php/JIPVET/article/view/46.

Infitria and Khalil, “Studi Produksi Dan kualitas Hijauan Dilahan Padang Rumput Upt peternakan Universitas Andalas,” Bul. Makanan Ternak, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2014.

AOAC, official method of analysis 17Th eddition. arlington: Assoc off Ana Chem, 2000.

M. S. A.A. Mattjik, Perancangan percobaan dan Aplikasi SAS dan Minitab, 1st ed. bogor: IPB Press, 2002.

Y.U. Hawolambani, H.P. Nastiti, dan Y.H.M anggol, “Produksi Hijauan Mkanan Ternak dan Komposisi Botani Padang Penggembalaan Pada Musim Hujan di Kecamatan Amarasi Barat Kabupaten Kupang,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2015.

A.E. Manu, “produktivitas padang penggembalaan saban timur timur barat,” pastura, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2013.

Damry, “Produksi dan Kandungan Nutrien Hijauan Padang Penggembalaan Alam di Kecamatan Lore Utara,” vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 296–300, 2009.

A. Marsetyo, Priyanti, and Pamungkas, Growth perfomance of young bali cattle under varoius feeding management. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada Univerrsity, 2006.

ACIAR, “Strategies to increase growth of weaned bali cattle,” 2008.

Bahrun, T. Widyastuti, N. Hidayat, D. A. Saputra, and D. R. Putri, “Daya Dukung Hijauan Rumput Alam Sebagai Pakan Ternak Sapi Potong di BKPH Kebasem, Banyumas,” Pros. Semin. Teknol. dan Agribisnis Peternak. VI Pengemb. Sumber Daya Genet. Ternak Lokal Menuju Swasembada Pangan Hewani ASUH, pp. 115–119, 2018.

N. Umami, E. Damayanti, Potensi dan Produksi Hijauan Pakan Ternak di Lahan Pertanian Banyusoco, Playen, Gunung Kidul. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Fakultas Peternakan UGM, 2016.